Al-Mushayt, O. S. (2019). Automating e-government services with artificial intelligence.
IEEE Access, 7, 146821–146829.
https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2946204
Amjed, H. M., Kosov, M., Fiume, R., Kuznetsov, N., Vasyunina, M., & Semin, A. (2023). Improving the efficiency of budgeting in industrial enterprise: The case of Russia, Italy, and the Middle East.
Emerging Science Journal, 7(1), 177–189.
https://doi.org/10.28991/ESJ-2023-07-01-013
Banitalebi-Dehkordi, A., Vedula, N., Pei, J., Xia, F., Wang, L., & Zhang, Y. (2021, August). Auto-split: A general framework of collaborative edge-cloud AI. In
Proceedings of the 27th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining (pp. 2543–2553).
https://doi.org/10.1145/3447548.3467078
Baumol, W. J. (1967). Macroeconomics of unbalanced growth: The anatomy of urban crisis.
The American Economic Review, 57(3), 415–426.
https://www.jstor.org/stable/1812111
Björklund, M., & Hegethorn, C. H. (2023). Pre-implementing smart budgeting: An exploration into AI-supported budgeting. [Unpublished manuscript].
Buchanan, J. M. (2014). Public finance in democratic process: Fiscal institutions and individual choice. UNC Press.
Buzuku, S., Farfan, J., Kässi, T., & Kraslawski, A. (2018). Analysis and ranking of drivers for eco-design implementation in the Finnish pulp and paper industry.
Procedia Manufacturing, 17, 1049–1057.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2018.10.081
Chowdhury, S., Dey, P., Joel-Edgar, S., Bhattacharya, S., Rodriguez-Espindola, O., Abadie, A., & Truong, L. (2023). Unlocking the value of artificial intelligence in human resource management through AI capability framework.
Human Resource Management Review, 33(1), 100899.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2022.100899
Cid, G. P., & Gil-García, J. R. (2004). Enacting e-budgeting in Mexico. Public Finance and Management, 4(2), 182–217.
Dehghanan, H., & Hrandi, A. (2014). Investigating the impacts of social capital on innovation performance with an emphasis on the mediatory role of knowledge transfer: A case study of Iranian IT knowledge-based firms.
Innovation Management Journal, 3(1), 1–22.
https://www.nowavari.ir/article_14671.html?lang=en
Desordi, D., & Bona, C. D. (2020). The artificial intelligence and the efficiency in the public administration.
Dwivedi, Y. K., Hughes, L., Ismagilova, E., Aarts, G., Coombs, C., Crick, T., ... & Williams, M. D. (2021). Artificial intelligence (AI): Multidisciplinary perspectives on emerging challenges, opportunities, and agenda for research, practice and policy.
International Journal of Information Management, 57, 101994.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.08.002
Elkadry, H., Shamsuzzaman, M., Piya, S., Haridy, S., Bashir, H., & Khadem, M. (2023). A fuzzy Delphi-AHP framework for identifying and prioritizing factors affecting students’ satisfaction in public high schools: Insights from the United Arab Emirates.
Journal of Engineering Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jer.2023.12.008
Engin, Z., & Treleaven, P. (2019). Algorithmic government: Automating public services and supporting civil servants in using data science technologies.
The Computer Journal, 62(3), 448–460.
https://doi.org/10.1093/comjnl/bxy082
Engstrom, D. F., Ho, D. E., Sharkey, C. M., & Cuéllar, M. F. (2020). Government by algorithm: Artificial intelligence in federal administrative agencies. NYU School of Law, Public Law Research Paper (20-54).
Fernandez-Cortez, V., Valle-Cruz, D., & Gil-Garcia, J. R. (2020, April). Can artificial intelligence help optimize the public budgeting process? Lessons about smartness and public value from the Mexican federal government. In
2020 Seventh International Conference on E-Democracy & E-Government (ICEDEG) (pp. 312–315). IEEE.
https://doi.org/10.1109/ICEDEG48599.2020.9096745
Gamayuni, R. R., & Hendrawaty, E. (2020). E-planning, e-budgeting and the quality of government institution performance accountability system in Indonesia. Talent Development & Excellence, 12(1s), 218–225.
Ghiassi, M., & Simo-Kengne, B. D. (2021). Machine learning for economic modeling: An application to South Africa's public expenditures.
International Journal of Public Administration in the Digital Age, 8(1), 1–17.
https://doi.org/10.4018/IJPADA.294120
Gil-Garcia, J. R., Helbig, N., & Ojo, A. (2014). Being smart: Emerging technologies and innovation in the public sector.
Government Information Quarterly, 31, I1–I8.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2014.09.001
Hagemann, N., Gawel, E., Purkus, A., Pannicke, N., & Hauck, J. (2016). Possible futures towards a wood-based bioeconomy: A scenario analysis for Germany.
Sustainability, 8(1), 98.
https://doi.org/10.3390/su8010098
Harsh, A., & Ichalkaranje, N. (2015). Transforming e-government to smart government: A South Australian perspective. In
Intelligent Computing, Communication and Devices: Proceedings of ICCD 2014, Volume 1 (pp. 9–16). Springer India.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-2012-1_2
Hatami, A., Sasanpour, F., Asadzadeh, H., & van Bodegom, P. M. (2023). Scenario analyses to reach smart sustainability in Tehran.
Journal of Urban Management, 12(4), 385–397.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jum.2023.09.002
Henage, C. B., Ferreri, S. P., Schlusser, C., Hughes, T. D., Armistead, L. T., Kelley, C. J., ... & Roberts, E. (2021). Transitioning focus group research to a videoconferencing environment: A descriptive analysis of interactivity.
Pharmacy, 9(3), 117.
https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmacy9030117
Hollander, A. S., & Icerman, R. C. (1991). Capital budgeting in governments: The feasibility of artificial intelligence technology.
Expert Systems with Applications, 3(1), 109–116.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0957-4174(91)90091-R
Jahanvand, B., Mortazavi, S. B., Mahabadi, H. A., & Ahmadi, O. (2023). Determining essential criteria for selection of risk assessment techniques in occupational health and safety: A hybrid framework of fuzzy Delphi method.
Safety Science, 167, 106253.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2023.106253
Kavanaugh, M., Fisher, K., & Quinlan, J. J. (2021). Use of focus groups to identify food safety risks for older adults in the US.
Foods, 11(1), 37.
https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11010037
Kumar, A., Moktadir, A., Liman, Z. R., Gunasekaran, A., Hegemann, K., & Khan, S. A. R. (2020). Evaluating sustainable drivers for social responsibility in the context of ready-made garments supply chain.
Journal of Cleaner Production, 248, 119231.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119231
Luo, H., & Luo, H. (2021). RPA and artificial intelligence in budget management based on multiperspective recognition based on network communication integration.
Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing, 2021, 9723379.
https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/9723379
Mikhail, B., Aleksei, M., & Ekaterina, S. (2018, April). On the way to legal framework for AI in public sector. In
Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance (pp. 682–684).
https://doi.org/10.1145/3209415.3209448
Mohammadhosseini, B., Hadizadeh, M., & Ghafelebashi, S. F. (2021). The drivers of sustainable cyber service offer in the government with an emphasis on maintaining security using artificial intelligence.
Journal of Iran Futures Studies, 5(2), 35–65.
https://doi.org/10.30479/JFS.2021.14002.1221
Musgrave, R., & Musgrave, P. (1984). Public finance in theory and practice. McGraw-Hill.
Ono, Y. (2011). The Keynesian multiplier effect reconsidered.
Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 43(4), 787–794.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1538-4616.2011.00397.x
Pavlik, J. V. (2023). Collaborating with ChatGPT: Considering the implications of generative artificial intelligence for journalism and media education.
Journalism & Mass Communication Educator, 78(1), 84–93.
https://doi.org/10.1177/10776958221149577
Petrudi, S. H. H., Ghomi, H., & Mazaheriasad, M. (2022). An integrated fuzzy Delphi and best-worst method (BWM) for performance measurement in higher education.
Decision Analytics Journal, 4, 100121.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dajour.2022.100121
Pritam, K., Puppala, H, Palla, S., Suriapparao, D. V., & Basak, T. (2023). A two-step hybrid multi-criteria approach to analyze the significance of parameters affecting microwave-assisted pyrolysis.
Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 171, 975–985.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2023.01.064
Rajendran, S., Kongot, A., & Varma, K. (2023, July). Ethical AI based decision making to reduce tax related debts for governments. In
International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (pp. 460–476). Springer Nature Switzerland.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-35891-3_28
Raper, R., Boeddinghaus, J., Coeckelbergh, M., Gross, W., Campigotto, P., & Lincoln, C. N. (2022). Sustainability budgets: A practical management and governance method for achieving Goal 13 of the Sustainable Development Goals for AI development.
Sustainability, 14(7), 4019.
https://doi.org/10.3390/su14074019
Reis, J., Santo, P. E., & Melão, N. (2019). Artificial intelligence in government services: A systematic literature review. In
New Knowledge in Information Systems and Technologies: Volume 1 (pp. 241–252).
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-16181-1_23
Reis, J., Santo, P. E., & Melão, N. (2019, June). Impacts of artificial intelligence on public administration: A systematic literature review. In
2019 14th Iberian Conference on Information Systems and Technologies (CISTI) (pp. 1–7). IEEE.
https://doi.org/10.23919/CISTI.2019.8760893
Robinson, M. (2014). Spending reviews.
OECD Journal on Budgeting, 13(2), 81–122.
https://doi.org/10.1787/16812336
Rodrigues, I., Magalhaes, D. R., & Trindade, M. A. (2022). Use of focus group as selection method of descriptors for check-all-that-apply (CATA) for sensory characteristics of hot dogs.
Foods, 11(3), 269.
https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11030269
Salamzadeh, A., Dana, L. P., Ebrahimi, P., Hadizadeh, M., & Mortazavi, S. (2024). Technological barriers to creating regional resilience in digital platform-based firms: Compound of performance sensitivity analysis and BIRCH algorithm.
Thunderbird International Business Review, 66(2), 135–149.
https://doi.org/10.1002/tie.22371
Salamzadeh, A., Dana, L. P., Rastgoo, N., Hadizadeh, M., & Mortazavi, S. M. (2024). The role of coopetition in fostering innovation and growth in new technology-based firms: A game theory approach.
BAR – Brazilian Administration Review, 21(1), e230097.
https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-7692bar2024230097
Salamzadeh, A., Rezaei, H., Hadizadeh, M., Yasin, N., & Ansari, G. (2023). The application of strategic foresight in women's entrepreneurship development.
Journal of Women’s Entrepreneurship and Education (JWEE), 16–36.
https://doi.org/10.28934/jwee23.pp16-36
Schick, A. (2014). The metamorphoses of performance budgeting.
OECD Journal on Budgeting, 13(2), 49–79.
https://doi.org/10.1787/16812336
Silcock, R. (2001). What is e-government?
Parliamentary Affairs, 54(1), 88–101.
https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/54.1.88
Stajic, J., Stone, R., Chin, G., & Wible, B. (2015). Rise of the machines.
Science, 349(6245), 248–249.
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.349.6245.248
Star, J., Rowland, E. L., Black, M. E., Enquist, C. A., Garfin, G., Hoffman, C. H., ... & Waple, A. M. (2016). Supporting adaptation decisions through scenario planning: Enabling the effective use of multiple methods.
Climate Risk Management, 13, 88–94.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crm.2016.08.001
Sun, T. Q., & Medaglia, R. (2019). Mapping the challenges of artificial intelligence in the public sector: Evidence from public healthcare.
Government Information Quarterly, 36(2), 368–383.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2018.09.008
Tang, Y. (2022). Government spending on local higher education institutions (LHEIs) in China: Analysing the determinants of general appropriations and their contributions.
Studies in Higher Education, 47(2), 423–436.
https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2020.1750586
Valle-Cruz, D., Criado, J. I., Sandoval-Almazán, R., & Ruvalcaba-Gomez, E. A. (2020). Assessing the public policy-cycle framework in the age of artificial intelligence: From agenda-setting to policy evaluation.
Government Information Quarterly, 37(4), 101509.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2020.101509
Valle-Cruz, D., Fernandez-Cortez, V., & Gil-Garcia, J. R. (2022). From e-budgeting to smart budgeting: Exploring the potential of artificial intelligence in government decision-making for resource allocation.
Government Information Quarterly, 39(2), 101644.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2021.101644
Valle-Cruz, D., Gil-Garcia, J. R., & Fernandez-Cortez, V. (2020, June). Towards smarter public budgeting? Understanding the potential of artificial intelligence techniques to support decision making in government. In
The 21st Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research (pp. 232–242).
https://doi.org/10.1145/3396956.3396995
Villacorta, P. J., Masegosa, A. D., Castellanos, D., & Lamata, M. T. (2014). A new fuzzy linguistic approach to qualitative cross impact analysis.
Applied Soft Computing, 24, 19–30.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2014.06.025
Vovchenko, N. G., Ivanova, O. B., Kostoglodova, E. D., Khapilin, A. F., & Khapilin, S. A. (2023). Issues of using artificial intelligence in the framework of public finance. In
Technological Trends in the AI Economy: International Review and Ways of Adaptation (pp. 329–335). Springer Nature Singapore.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-7411-3_35
Wang, F. (2022). AI-enabled IT capability and organizational performance.
Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 39(3), 609–617.
https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.2852
Whitlock, C., & Strickland, F. (2022). Government programming and budgeting for AI leaders. In
Winning the National Security AI Competition: A Practical Guide for Government and Industry Leaders (pp. 79–97). Apress.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4842-8814-6_4
Wirtz, B. W., Weyerer, J. C., & Geyer, C. (2019). Artificial intelligence and the public sector—Applications and challenges.
International Journal of Public Administration, 42(7), 596–615.
https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2018.1498103
Zhang, X., & Fang, X. (2023). The progress and prospects in the scenario simulation research on the sustainability of regional ecosystem services based on a “safe operating space”.
Sustainability, 15(14), 11249.
https://doi.org/10.3390/su151411249
