Al-Mushayt, O. S. (2019). Automating E-government services with artificial intelligence. IEEE Access, 7, 146821-146829.
Amjed, H. M., Kosov, M., Fiume, R., Kuznetsov, N., Vasyunina, M., & Semin, A. (2023). Improving the Efficiency of Budgeting in Industrial Enterprise: The case of Russia, Italy, and the Middle East. Emerging Science Journal, 7(1), 177-189.
Banitalebi-Dehkordi, A., Vedula, N., Pei, J., Xia, F., Wang, L., & Zhang, Y. (2021, August). Auto-split: A general framework of collaborative edge-cloud AI. In
Proceedings of the 27th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining (pp. 2543-2553).
https://dl.acm.org/doi/abs/10.1145/3447548.3467078
Baumol, W. J. (1967). Macroeconomics of unbalanced growth: the anatomy of urban crisis. The American economic review, 57(3), 415-426.
Björklund, M., & Hegethorn, C. H. (2023). Pre-Implementing Smart Budgeting: An exploration into AI-supported budgeting.
Buchanan, J. M. (2014). Public finance in democratic process: Fiscal institutions and individual choice. UNC Press Books.
Buzuku, S., Farfan, J., Kässi, T., & Kraslawski, A. (2018). Analysis and ranking of drivers for eco-design implementation in the Finnish pulp and paper industry. Procedia Manufacturing, 17, 1049-1057.
Chowdhury, S., Dey, P., Joel-Edgar, S., Bhattacharya, S., Rodriguez-Espindola, O., Abadie, A., & Truong, L. (2023). Unlocking the value of artificial intelligence in human resource management through AI capability framework. Human Resource Management Review, 33(1), 100899.
Cid, G. P., & Gil-García, J. R. (2004). Enacting e-budgeting in Mexico (1). Public Finance and Management, 4(2), 182-217.
Dehghanan, H., & Hrandi, A. (2014). Investigating the impacts of social capital on innovation performance with an emphasis on the mediatory role of knowledge transfer: A case study of Iranian IT knowledge-based firms.
Innovation Management Journal,
3(1), 1-22.
https://www.nowavari.ir/article_14671.html?lang=en
Desordi, D., & Bona, C. D. (2020). The artificial intelligence and the efficiency in the public administration.
Dwivedi, Y. K., Hughes, L., Ismagilova, E., Aarts, G., Coombs, C., Crick, T., ... & Williams, M. D. (2021). Artificial Intelligence (AI): Multidisciplinary perspectives on emerging challenges, opportunities, and agenda for research, practice and policy.
International journal of information management,
57, 101994. DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.08.002
Elkadry, H., Shamsuzzaman, M., Piya, S., Haridy, S., Bashir, H., & Khadem, M. (2023). A fuzzy Delphi-AHP framework for identifying and prioritizing factors affecting students’ satisfaction in public high schools: Insights from the United Arab Emirates. Journal of Engineering Research.
Engin, Z., & Treleaven, P. (2019). Algorithmic government: Automating public services and supporting civil servants in using data science technologies.
The Computer Journal,
62(3), 448-460.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/comjnl/bxy082
Engstrom, D. F., Ho, D. E., Sharkey, C. M., & Cuéllar, M. F. (2020). Government by algorithm: Artificial intelligence in federal administrative agencies. NYU School of Law, Public Law Research Paper, (20-54).
Fernandez-Cortez, V., Valle-Cruz, D., & Gil-Garcia, J. R. (2020, April). Can artificial intelligence help optimize the public budgeting process? Lessons about smartness and public value from the Mexican federal government. In
2020 Seventh International Conference on EDemocracy & EGovernment (ICEDEG) (pp. 312-315). IEEE.
DOI: https://doi.org/ 10.1109/ICEDEG48599.2020.9096745
Gamayuni, R. R., & Hendrawaty, E. (2020). E-Planning, E-Budgeting and the Quality of Government Institution Performance Accountability System in Indonesia. Talent Development & Excellence, 12(1s), 218-225.
Ghiassi, M., & Simo-Kengne, B. D. (2021). Machine Learning for Economic Modeling: An Application to South Africa's Public Expenditures. International Journal of Public Administration in the Digital Age (IJPADA), 8(1), 1-17.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4018/IJPADA.294120
Gil-Garcia, J. R., Helbig, N., & Ojo, A. (2014). Being smart: Emerging technologies and innovation in the public sector.
Government information quarterly,
31, I1-I8. DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2014.09.001
Hagemann, N., Gawel, E., Purkus, A., Pannicke, N., & Hauck, J. (2016). Possible futures towards a wood-based bioeconomy: A scenario analysis for Germany.
Sustainability,
8(1), 98. DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3390/su8010098
Harsh, A., & Ichalkaranje, N. (2015). Transforming e-government to smart government: A South Australian perspective. In Intelligent Computing, Communication and Devices: Proceedings of ICCD 2014, Volume 1 (pp. 9-16). Springer India. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-2012-1_2
Hatami, A., Sasanpour, F., Asadzadeh, H., & van Bodegom, P. M. (2023). Scenario analyses to reach smart sustainability in Tehran.
Journal of Urban Management,
12(4), 385-397. DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jum.2023.09.002
Henage, C. B., Ferreri, S. P., Schlusser, C., Hughes, T. D., Armistead, L. T., Kelley, C. J.,... & Roberts, E. (2021). Transitioning focus group research to a videoconferencing environment: a descriptive analysis of interactivity. Pharmacy, 9(3), 117.
Hollander, A. S., & Icerman, R. C. (1991). Capital budgeting in governments: the feasibility of artificial intelligence technology.
Expert Systems with Applications,
3(1), 109-116. DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1016/0957-4174(91)90091-R
Jahanvand, B., Mortazavi, S. B., Mahabadi, H. A., & Ahmadi, O. (2023). Determining essential criteria for selection of risk assessment techniques in occupational health and safety: A hybrid framework of fuzzy Delphi method.
Safety science,
167, 106253. DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2023.106253
Kavanaugh, M., Fisher, K., & Quinlan, J. J. (2021). Use of focus groups to identify food safety risks for older adults in the US. Foods, 11(1), 37.
Kumar, A., Moktadir, A., Liman, Z. R., Gunasekaran, A., Hegemann, K., & Khan, S. A. R. (2020). Evaluating sustainable drivers for social responsibility in the context of ready-made garments supply chain.
Journal of Cleaner Production,
248, 119231. DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119231
Luo, H., & Luo, H. (2021). RPA and Artificial Intelligence in Budget Management Based on Multiperspective Recognition Based on Network Communication Integration.
Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing,
2021(1), 9723379. DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/9723379
Mikhail, B., Aleksei, M., & Ekaterina, S. (2018, April). On the way to legal framework for AI in public sector. In Proceedings of the 11th International conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance (pp. 682-684).
Mohammadhosseini, B., Hadizadeh, M., & Ghafelebashi, S. F. (2021). The drivers of sustainable cyber service offer in the government with an emphasis on maintaining security using artificial intelligence.
Journal of Iran Futures Studies,
5(2), 35-65. DOI: https://doi.org/
10.30479/JFS.2021.14002.1221
Musgrave, R., & Musgrave, P. (1984). Public finance in theory and practice. Mc Graw Hill.
Ono, Y. (2011). The Keynesian multiplier effect reconsidered.
Journal of Money, credit and banking,
43(4), 787-794. DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1538-4616.2011.00397.x
Pavlik, J. V. (2023). Collaborating with ChatGPT: Considering the implications of generative artificial intelligence for journalism and media education. Journalism & mass communication educator, 78(1), 84-93.
Petrudi, S. H. H., Ghomi, H., & Mazaheriasad, M. (2022). An Integrated Fuzzy Delphi and Best Worst Method (BWM) for performance measurement in higher education. Decision Analytics Journal, 4, 100121.
Pritam, K., Puppala, H., Palla, S., Suriapparao, D. V., & Basak, T. (2023). A two-step hybrid multi-criteria approach to analyze the significance of parameters affecting microwave-assisted pyrolysis.
Process Safety and Environmental Protection,
171, 975-985. DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2023.01.064
Rajendran, S., Kongot, A., & Varma, K. (2023, July). Ethical AI Based Decision Making to Reduce Tax Related Debts for Governments. In International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (pp. 460-476). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-35891-3_28
Raper, R., Boeddinghaus, J., Coeckelbergh, M., Gross, W., Campigotto, P., & Lincoln, C. N. (2022). Sustainability budgets: A practical management and governance method for achieving goal 13 of the sustainable development goals for AI development.
Sustainability,
14(7), 4019. DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3390/su14074019
Reis, J., Santo, P. E., & Melão, N. (2019). Artificial intelligence in government services: A systematic literature review. New Knowledge in Information Systems and Technologies: Volume 1, 241-252. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-16181-1_23
Reis, J., Santo, P. E., & Melão, N. (2019, June). Impacts of artificial intelligence on public administration: A systematic literature review. In 2019 14th Iberian conference on information systems and technologies (CISTI) (pp. 1-7). IEEE.
Robinson, M. (2014). Spending reviews.
OECD Journal on Budgeting,
13(2), 81-122. DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1787/16812336
Rodrigues, I., Magalhaes, D. R., & Trindade, M. A. (2022). Use of focus group as selection method of descriptors for check-all-that-apply (CATA) for sensory characteristics of hot dogs. Foods, 11(3), 269.
Salamzadeh, A., Dana, L. P., Ebrahimi, P., Hadizadeh, M., & Mortazavi, S. (2024). Technological barriers to creating regional resilience in digital platform‐based firms: Compound of performance sensitivity analysis and BIRCH algorithm. Thunderbird International Business Review, 66(2), 135-149.
Salamzadeh, A., Dana, L. P., Rastgoo, N., Hadizadeh, M., & Mortazavi, S. M. (2024). The Role of Coopetition in Fostering Innovation and Growth in New Technology-based Firms: A Game Theory Approach.
BAR-Brazilian Administration Review,
21(1), e230097. DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-7692bar2024230097
Salamzadeh, A., Rezaei, H., Hadizadeh, M., Yasin, N., & Ansari, G. (2023). The Application of Strategic Foresight in Women's Entrepreneurship Development.
JWEE, 16-36. DOI:
https://doi.org/10.28934/jwee23.pp16-36
Schick, A. (2014). The metamorphoses of performance budgeting.
OECD Journal on Budgeting,
13(2), 49-79. DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1787/16812336
Silcock, R. (2001). What is e-government.
Parliamentary affairs,
54(1), 88-101. DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/54.1.88
Stajic, J., Stone, R., Chin, G., & Wible, B. (2015). Rise of the machines. Science, 349(6245), 248-249.
Star, J., Rowland, E. L., Black, M. E., Enquist, C. A., Garfin, G., Hoffman, C. H., ... & Waple, A. M. (2016). Supporting adaptation decisions through scenario planning: Enabling the effective use of multiple methods.
Climate Risk Management,
13, 88-94. DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crm.2016.08.001
Sun, T. Q., & Medaglia, R. (2019). Mapping the challenges of Artificial Intelligence in the public sector: Evidence from public healthcare.
Government Information Quarterly,
36(2), 368-383. DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2018.09.008
Sun, T. Q., & Medaglia, R. (2019). Mapping the challenges of Artificial Intelligence in the public sector: Evidence from public healthcare.
Government Information Quarterly,
36(2), 368-383. DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2018.09.008
Tang, Y. (2022). Government spending on local higher education institutions (LHEIs) in China: analysing the determinants of general appropriations and their contributions. Studies in Higher Education, 47(2), 423-436.
Valle-Cruz, D., Criado, J. I., Sandoval-Almazán, R., & Ruvalcaba-Gomez, E. A. (2020). Assessing the public policy-cycle framework in the age of artificial intelligence: From agenda-setting to policy evaluation.
Government Information Quarterly,
37(4), 101509. DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2020.101509
Valle-Cruz, D., Criado, J. I., Sandoval-Almazán, R., & Ruvalcaba-Gomez, E. A. (2020). Assessing the public policy-cycle framework in the age of artificial intelligence: From agenda-setting to policy evaluation.
Government Information Quarterly,
37(4), 101509. DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2020.101509
Valle-Cruz, D., Fernandez-Cortez, V., & Gil-Garcia, J. R. (2022). From E-budgeting to smart budgeting: Exploring the potential of artificial intelligence in government decision-making for resource allocation.
Government Information Quarterly,
39(2), 101644.
DOI: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2021.101644
Valle-Cruz, D., Gil-Garcia, J. R., & Fernandez-Cortez, V. (2020, June). Towards smarter public budgeting? Understanding the potential of artificial intelligence techniques to support decision making in government. In The 21st Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research (pp. 232-242).
Valle-Cruz, D., Gil-Garcia, J. R., & Fernandez-Cortez, V. (2020, June). Towards smarter public budgeting? Understanding the potential of artificial intelligence techniques to support decision making in government. In The 21st Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research (pp. 232-242).
Villacorta, P. J., Masegosa, A. D., Castellanos, D., & Lamata, M. T. (2014). A new fuzzy linguistic approach to qualitative Cross Impact Analysis.
Applied Soft Computing,
24, 19-30. DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2014.06.025
Vovchenko, N. G., Ivanova, O. B., Kostoglodova, E. D., Khapilin, A. F., & Khapilin, S. A. (2023). Issues of Using Artificial Intelligence in the Framework of Public Finance. In Technological Trends in the AI Economy: International Review and Ways of Adaptation (pp. 329-335). Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-7411-3_35
Wang, F. (2022). AI‐enabled IT capability and organizational performance. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 39(3), 609-617.
Whitlock, C., & Strickland, F. (2022). Government Programming and Budgeting for AI Leaders. In
Winning the National Security AI Competition: A Practical Guide for Government and Industry Leaders (pp. 79-97). Berkeley, CA: Apress. DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4842-8814-6_4
Wirtz, B. W., Weyerer, J. C., & Geyer, C. (2019). Artificial intelligence and the public sector—applications and challenges. International Journal of Public Administration, 42(7), 596-615.
Zhang, X., & Fang, X. (2023). The Progress and Prospects in the Scenario Simulation Research on the Sustainability of Regional Ecosystem Services Based on a “Safe Operating Space”. Sustainability, 15(14), 11249.
